Which of the following is NOT a reason for ordering clinical restraints?

Ordering clinical restraints is a practice governed by specific standards and ethical considerations in correctional facilities. The correct choice reflects that general punishment is not an acceptable reason for using restraints. Restraints should only be employed as a necessary measure to manage specific behaviors or to protect the health and safety of the individual or others.

Self-harm prevention is a widely recognized rationale for the application of restraints, as they can be used to protect individuals who are at risk of harming themselves. Medical necessity also justifies the use of restraints when they are needed to administer medical care safely and effectively, ensuring that an individual does not cause harm during necessary treatments. Escape prevention can be another valid reason for using restraints, primarily when there is a credible threat of escape that would endanger the individual or others.

In contrast, using restraints as a general punishment is not permissible because it contradicts the ethical obligation to treat individuals with dignity and respect. Restraints should always be considered a last resort, only applied in situations that demand immediate action to mitigate serious risks. This understanding is fundamental to maintaining appropriate standards of care and ethical practice within correctional facilities.